ValleyViews 發表于 2015-10-8 02:22 + ~+ ~9 t; _$ m- ^* e3 r+ r四海之內皆兄弟也。+ O- R; _! I% T1 w h1 _
Talking about your explanation, I think that every sent ...
9 L9 F& D2 S1 u# J4 C. v8 V大俠,多謝跟我討論這個問題。:D 小弟聯系方式已經站內信PM大俠0 j/ j: s* Z$ t m6 C. u& x
8 {% o1 m- e! T5 a4 i! @
As for the problem of line element, I still consider it as a 2D element. I may misunderstand something. I will appreciate your instruction if you can give me more explanation about it. 9 ~3 l% N; @0 b' d$ _' c* e. h5 {* R6 t 3 h) s1 X0 c/ R, W& ]3 K; SI just got an idea about this problem. Did you want to tell me that the line elements measured in the actual components can be torqued or twisted, so they may have 3 dimensions?
本帖最后由 ValleyViews 于 2015-10-8 17:35 編輯 . T9 h+ S G) d
aysuio 發表于 2015-10-8 02:47 5 q4 ~0 n* }; J" \# A. F# D4 p N
大俠,多謝跟我討論這個問題。:D 小弟聯系方式已經站內信PM大俠 2 h2 r. v _2 xAs for the problem of line eleme ...
3 ]- y0 b8 \1 {, O9 X; z/ I
我個人很喜歡這個帖子,其問題本身的重要性暫時可以超過其結論。還希望樓主大俠幫助我和大家共同學習提高。9 z" t. E9 H* K N
( t" W* p) {' T+ fPut it in this way, one single line element in a specified view could be considered as a 2d line, but multiple line elements in same view and in certain interval can establish a cluster of lines that can be considered as a kind of 3d image. Furthermore, multiple cross line elements in front view and side view can set up a net construction image that will be able to describe the flatness well enough. That's why some persons think that the new version Y14.5 would regulate the cross views straightness equal to flatness of a planar surface.
aysuio 發表于 2015-10-7 05:02 : V2 ~- k( l8 g& PHi, Valleyviews, 9 ]/ w6 L+ {" R: c, R! F' p; z# X- g* u$ b1 s* ]4 B& A
You were saying the fig in Y14.5-2009. And yes, it is talking about this problem ...
# J5 s6 l P9 K! A- t( b" @. qThink about this problem really helps. I have to say that thank you for your good job. Have a nice weekend,3 h# y7 N1 n9 }& o9 b